YOUR FEEDBACK
Jeremy Geelan wrote: Dr von Eicken will be giving a technical session at SYS-CON's "Cloud Computing E...


2008 East
DIAMOND SPONSOR:
Data Direct
Frontiers in Data Access: The Coming Wave in Data Services
PLATINUM SPONSORS:
Red Hat
The Opening of Virtualization
Intel
Virtualization – Path to Predictive Enterprise
Green Hills
IT Security in a Hostile World
JBoss / freedom oss
Practical SOA Approach
GOLD SPONSORS:
Software AG
The Art & Science of SOA: How Governance Enables Adoption
PlateSpin
Effective Planning for Virtual Infrastructure Growth
Fujitsu
Automated Business Process Discovery & Virtualization Service
Ceedo
Workspace Virtualization
Click For 2007 West
Event Webcasts

2008 East
PLATINUM SPONSORS:
Appcelerator
Think Fast: Accelerate AJAX Development with Appcelerator
GOLD SPONSORS:
DreamFace Interactive
The Ultimate Framework for Creating Personalized Web 2.0 Mashups
ICEsoft
AJAX and Social Computing for the Enterprise
Kaazing
Enterprise Comet: Real–Time, Real–Time, or Real–Time Web 2.0?
Nexaweb
Now Playing: Desktop Apps in the Browser!
Sun
jMaki as an AJAX Mashup Framework
POWER PANELS:
The Business Value
of RIAs
What Lies Beyond AJAX?
KEYNOTES:
Douglas Crockford
Can We Fix the Web?
Anthony Franco
2008: The Year of the RIA
Click For 2007 Event Webcasts
SYS-CON.TV
TOP THREE LINKS YOU MUST CLICK ON


Oracle To Buy Siebel and Make Itself "The World's No. 1 CRM Company"
The offer is valued at approximately $5.85 billion, or $3.61 billion net of Siebel's cash on hand of $2.24 billion

Oracle has at last become the number one CRM applications company in the world. "Siebel's 4,000 applications customers and 3,400,000 CRM users strengthen our number one position in applications in North America and move us closer to the number one position in applications globally," said Larry Ellison as Oracle announced yesterday that it had agreed to buy Siebel Systems, Inc for $10.66 per share.

"Today is a great day for Siebel Systems' customers, partners, shareholders, and employees," said Thomas M. Siebel, Chairman of Siebel Systems. "The combination of Siebel applications with the development capacity of Oracle to enhance our CRM product set assures our customers continuing success. This is a very beneficial business combination that will allow us to be even more effective in delivering high quality, leading edge solutions into the hands of satisfied customers."

"This is a customer driven event. Our joint customers have consistently recommended this transaction to both companies for over a year," said Oracle President Charles Phillips. "We will embrace Siebel's best-in-class CRM products and make the features of those products the centerpiece of our Project Fusion CRM."

"We expect this transaction to be accretive to Oracle's earnings on a non-GAAP basis in its first full year (FY07)," said Oracle President and CFO Greg Maffei. "Longer term, Siebel will contribute to Oracle's stated goal of 20 percent annual earnings growth. Given the size of our existing R&D investment, scale of our global support infrastructure, and similarity of our back office requirements, we will recognize substantial efficiencies from combining our two businesses."

CRM applications capture and streamline all customer interactions so CRM users can better understand, service and anticipate their own customers' needs. Of all major segments of the enterprise applications business, CRM is the largest and fastest growing -- estimated to be more than $8 billion in 2004 and expected to grow to $10 billion by 2009, according to IDC. Siebel's CRM and Oracle's enterprise applications and middleware share an architecture that embraces industry standards, and a significant majority of Siebel's implementations run on the Oracle database.

The Board of Directors of Siebel Systems has voted in favor of the transaction, and Tom Siebel has agreed to vote his shares in favor of the acquisition. Siebel stockholders will convene in a special meeting to vote on the acquisition. Oracle stockholder approval is not required. While the transaction and the timing are subject to regulatory approvals, the deal is expected to close in early 2006.

Siebel shareholders will receive $10.66 per share in cash for each Siebel share held, unless they elect to receive Oracle common stock, but no more than 30% of Siebel's common shares may be exchanged for Oracle common stock. In the event that Siebel shareholders holding more than 30% of Siebel common stock elect to receive Oracle common stock, the equity consideration will be pro-rated.

The measurement period for Oracle's average share price will be the ten trading days ending the day prior to close, and Oracle will have the right to choose an election date during the twenty trading days ending two days prior to close. If Oracle's average share price is at or above $10.72 prior to close, Siebel shareholders who elect to receive stock will receive $10.66 per share of value in Oracle common stock for each share of Siebel common stock held. If Oracle's average share price prior to close is less than $10.72 per share, Siebel shareholders that elect to receive stock will receive 0.994 shares of Oracle common stock for each share of Siebel common stock held, which would result in a value of less than $10.66 per share.

Oracle intends to repurchase an amount of shares equal to the number of shares issued in the transaction.

About Oracle News Desk
Oracle News Desk trawls the world's news information sources and brings you timely updates on Oracle and its ever-expanding enterprise software portfolio, including its entire range of tools for managing business data, supporting business operations, and facilitating collaboration and application development.

YOUR FEEDBACK
marco marcelo wrote:
AW wrote: Alex Prayle, can you provide a code sample to demonstrate an "efficiently implemented TableModel" ?
Dmitry Leskov wrote: ... that SWT in combination with one third-party tool enable GUI Java apps to be distributed as compact native Windows EXEs running without the JRE? http://www.excelsior-usa.com/jetswt.html This could have been possible with AWT/Swing apps too, if Sun JRE license was not too restricive...
Travell Perkins wrote: The dot com boom had to be the worst thing for client side development in general. Coding a proper client takes as much skill as any server side process. The problem is that most developers have not cultivated the proper skills for client side dev, focusing primarily on the server side and HTML clients. Further more few frameworks provide more than just a handful of widgets; Swing and SWT are both guilty of this. As far as Swing performance goes, its not a problem. I have implemented a next generation client side UI framework using IntelliJ as my dev environment and the framework is built on top of Swing. I use to code in Netbeans which is a complete dog. IntelliJ is blazing and guess what? They turn off directdraw for the Java2D subsystem by default! Note: The GDI in Windows XP is blazingly fast compared to previous implementations. Bottom line. If a Java client side applicatio...
Nick Evgeniev wrote: Hi, The first thing I have to mention SWT is not a true cross platform library. Trust me I program in both the Swing and SWT. a) Each platform support requries to write huge amount of code. Just check the SWT source by yourself. While windows x86 implementation is more or less production quality, the other ports are vary from alpha stage (MacOS, PocketPC) to early beta(linux). b) With every added platform SWT development becomes slower and slower because API was designed by Windows programming people who knows nothing about other platforms. c) SWT was designed not as an Standard widget toolkit, but as Eclipse widget toolkit. So, if you are designing application that doesn't look (behaves) like eclipse then you are in trouble. Just check eclipse.tools forum or TRUST ME. The problem of Swing is not the speed but low qualified developers. Just try to compare borland JDeveloper (dog...
Mike wrote: Some interesting open source alternative to AWT and Swing. Support nearly all java versions (starting from 1.1) Check online demo (should work in most browsers including IE): http://www.zaval.org/products/lwvcl/demo/index.html
Stephen Strenn wrote: For those who believe that Swing is a great UI system, feel free to use it. Personally, I am almost GRATEFUL that SWT has come along to provide me with a UI for my Windows-based Java apps. I have now built major apps with both Swing and SWT, and the SWT user experience wins, hands down. Swing tends to be slow and frustrating. SWT is almost universally snappy and responsive. Not only that, but SWT allows me access to the wide world of ActiveX objects. In particular, I have been able to script MS Excel from within my Java app - a very useful feature for those who write business apps, since a lot of worthwhile corporate data is ferreted away in Excel workbooks.
Michele Costabile wrote: SWT is the right choice, abstract enough and native as it can be, it must be promoted to standard. In fact SWT can be described as AWT made without excessive haste. When the Java developers had to create Swing, they must have thought that trying to use native toookits under a thin layrer of abstraction was too difficult. Designing a new toookit from scratch with its rules and look and feel was more attractive and rewarding for the developers. The look and feel of the platform could be easily emulated, they thought. The outcome is that you have a java look wherever you go. Even with emulation you have two pitfalls. One: it is not perfect and you can tell it is not native (jgoodies can do something about that); two: seeing a Java application trying to have a Windows 2000 look and feel when you are running XP is funny (nice try, swing). This is the original sin: putting all Java devel...
Lane Sharman wrote: Conga is Java's fastest and easiest way to create rich GUIs which are 100% Java. Have looked at SWT and Swing, and am convinced that you can get a lot better mileage out with Conga.
Anthony wrote: Rather than unsubstantiated opinions, has anyone actually actually done some benchmarks? I'd love to hear about even one operation well implemented on SVG and Swing in which one was better than the other. Also, if SVG really is better than Swing, is that because C++ in the O/S is faster than Java? That would be a serious criticism. Maybe adding things like C# Struts to Java would help...
Chuck Jang wrote: First, Eclipse doesn't promote anything- it's an open source community. Secondly, the reason there isn't a GUI Builder was for political reasons more than any other. IBM had to spare Sun the final embarrassment of releasing something that was conceptually superior to anything Sun ever released.
Jon Perez wrote: Considering that Swing performs nicely under Mac OS X(*), the problem seems to be that it is not Swing itself but its implementation on Win32 and Linux. Sun cares far less about Swing than Apple does it seems... pity. If it did then Swing and Java on the desktop (on the 3 major platforms - Mac, Windoze, Linux) would now probably be a lot more popular than it is right now. I don't mind the non-native L&F as the whole point of Swing is to be _cross-platform_ standard. (*) I don't know if its a memory hog under Mac OS though...
Josh Knowles wrote: All you have to do is look at products like IntelliJ to see that Swing can handle it, and it will only get better.
Carlos Perez wrote: The argument that Swing doesn't look like Windows or its native OS and therefore its a bad option is completely ludicrous. Applications these days come in all sorts of look and feel. Just look at all those multimedia players. They don't look anything like Windows. Windows XP doesn't look like Windows, people are used to seeing different kinds of windows, and guess what, people don't mind!
Carlos Perez wrote: A fair comparison of Swing vs SWT is to look at IDEA. IDEA is at par with Eclipse's capabilities, but its written in Swing. What the Java world needs to do, is to follow the lead of www.jgoodies.com , what that means is to make it easier to write Swing applications that look good. Swing is highly capable, the big question though is that if you're a novice, can you write something that looks nice? I think this article is born out of pure ignorance, the fact that it comes from this magazine is embarrasing. Furthermore, the Eclipse project doesn't promote the use of SWT outside of the IDEA, if it did, you would have a gui builder for SWT. If you did benchmarks on the table class for SWT, you'll find it doesn't perform as well as Swing.
Brandon Rife wrote: Operating systems have a look and feel that users get used to and feel comfortable with. Deviating from that L&F is asking for trouble. I'm sick of jumping through hoops to make Swing apps look, feel, and behave like native OS applications. SWT is the right philosophy - When in Rome do as the Romans...or your app will end up in the catacombs.
Noble Paul wrote: At some point swing might end up somewhere close to native UI in speed and performance.But it still is a memory hogging beast. Just take a look at the amount of memory consumed by the leading java IDE Intellij and Eclipse. Moreover why should the user sacrifice the look and feel which he is used to in his favourite OS. Most of the applications can do without custom Widgets. At least , that is what we should assume from the millions of web applications we see around. I strongly believe SWT applications on Java web start can fill the gap for a true clientside low footprint applications platform. That will ultimately help java reign the desktop the way it did with the server.
Chuck Jang wrote: It amazes me that this debate is still alive. If it weren't for the relative immaturity of SWT, we wouldn't even be having this exchange. SWT is technically superior to Swing in every way that's important. If you've invested alot of time using Swing, that doesn't mean you should stay invested. The stock market thud seems like a good analogy.
gumby wrote: I fail to see the large-scale advantage of SWT. Extending even a simple widget (which is inevitable, except for uninteresting GUIs) is a PITA. If your sole target is windows, then why not just code in C#? And if it's not, do you really want to invest the extra cross-platform coding and testing time for SWT? Because in order to use native GUI components, you have to use the data models for those native components. I do most development on OSX, so maybe I've just never seen this "huge" speed advantage (yes, I've tried eclipse on both w32 and OSX). And a speed advantage alone has never succeeded in supplanting solutions which in the end are easier to manage or develop (VB, anyone?)
M.Schipperheyn wrote: Just look at any Java IDE based on Swing, e.g. JDeveloper from Oracle. Great stuff, but SLOOOOOOWWWWWW. Then check out Eclipse. Even better than JDeveloper and very comparable. Great stuff and lightning fast. To realize that all these years we have been punished with Swing and AWT while we could have had SWT (or something similar) is mind boggling. Let's hope SWT becomes part of the standard.
LATEST JAVA STORIES & POSTS
Government intervention and direction has long been critical to the development of the computer industry. The Internet, after all, was derived from the ARPANET, developed in the early 1970s from a U.S. government-sponsored research project by the Advanced Research Projects Agency...
Commercial systems are developed with a huge range of performance requirements and we are concerned in this article with the small number of systems where absolute maximum performance is demanded either in terms of execution speed or available memory. We'll discuss the role of be...
Genuitec announced the availability of MyEclipse Enterprise Workbench 7.0 milestone 1. This milestone release delivers advanced AJAX tooling for Java EE and full Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) capabilities for Eclipse 3.4 Ganymede, among other enhancements.
Genuitec announced the availability of the first milestone release of MyEclipse 7.0 Blue Edition. This release provides WebSphere developers with advanced AJAX tooling, enhanced reporting technologies and Eclipse 3.4 support, among other enhancements.
Red Hat CTO Brian Stevens, Citrix CTO Simon Crosby, Egenera CTO Pete Manca, Allen Stewart, Group Manager, Windows Virtualization at Microsoft, and Brian Duckering, Sr. Director of Products and Alliances at Symantec were the top industry executives who joined Jeremy Geelan in the ...
Clear Toolkit 3.0 is a set of components, code generators, and plugins created by software engineers of Farata Systems that they were using internally in multiple Flex enterprise projects. This toolkit will be available free of charge.
SUBSCRIBE TO THE WORLD'S MOST POWERFUL NEWSLETTERS
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR RSS FEEDS & GET YOUR SYS-CON NEWS LIVE!
Click to Add our RSS Feeds to the Service of Your Choice:
Google Reader or Homepage Add to My Yahoo! Subscribe with Bloglines Subscribe in NewsGator Online
myFeedster Add to My AOL Subscribe in Rojo Add 'Hugg' to Newsburst from CNET News.com Kinja Digest View Additional SYS-CON Feeds
Publish Your Article! Please send it to editorial(at)sys-con.com!

Advertise on this site! Contact advertising(at)sys-con.com! 201 802-3021


SYS-CON FEATURED WHITEPAPERS

SPONSORED BY INFRAGISTICS
There are many forces that influence technological evolution. After a decade of building enterprise ...
2008 is going to be an important year for Rich Internet Applications. Most organizations are deliver...
The OpenAjax Alliance is developing an Ajax industry wishlist for future browsers, using a dedicated...
In every field of design one of the first things students do is learn from the work of others. They ...
Infragistics announced the availability of two Community Technology Preview (CTP) User Interface (UI...
The YUI development team has released version 2.5.2; you can download the new release from SourceFor...
ADS BY GOOGLE
BREAKING JAVA NEWS
As college campuses, in response to student demands, search for green products, undergrads are diggi...